Exploring the Green Infrastructure Workforce

Image via the Stormwater Guidance Retrofit Manual courtesy of Philadelphia Water

Urbanization has altered the natural landscape and affected the hydrologic cycle. Where the natural hydrologic cycle maintains a balance of water circulation through evaporation, precipitation and groundwater recharge, and absorption and transpiration by plants, urbanization has resulted in an altered hydrologic cycle through construction of impervious surfaces such as buildings, roads, and parking lots. 

The water has nowhere to go except into a city's seemingly endless configuration sewer pipes, systems which are becoming increasingly overburdened and thus prone to overflows and outfalls of polluted runoff into watersheds, such as rivers, lakes and creeks during heavy rains. 

In urban areas with combined sewer systems, such as Philadelphia, Chicago and New York,  the impact is can be particularly troublesome because the discharges, known as CSOs or combined sewer overflows, often contain untreated sewage.

Green stormwater infrastructure is an incremental, ecologically centered, low impact development approach to mitigate these outfalls by reducing the amount of runoff that goes to the sewer system and by utilizing the water as a resource, via rain gardens, tree trenches, permeable paving, rain barrels, green roofs and more.

Because of its incremental approach, the implementation cost for cities is often much less than heavily engineered concrete gray infrastructure efforts. It may not be the sole solution, but it offers a plethora of benefits measured in more ways than just pollution prevention. Benefits such as awakening the urban ecosystem through tree planting and stream restoration, bringing together local communities over health and environment issues, and spawning a thriving new "green collar" workforce that offers opportunity to urban areas left buried in the ruins of the industrial age.

The NatureWORKS report by Jobs For the Future, jff.org, for example, contends that "in urban green infrastructure, there is an opportunity for entry-level jobs with the possibility for advancement. It is a win-win for cities to invest in sustainability and achieve both a healthier, greener community and a job development program."

Other efforts, such as with the Great Urban Parks Campaign, the National Recreation and Parks Association and the American Planning Association are also working to demonstrate the benefits of green infrastructure in urban communities. Their video below states that "using parks for green infrastructure is a creative and cost-effective alternative to gray infrastructure that allows nature to filter pollutants from rain water, reduce storm water issues and give communities access to more green space."




The NatureWORKS report is available for download in PDF at the following link: https://jfforg-prod-prime.s3.amazonaws.com/media/documents/NatureWORKS-Issue-Brief-032317_v3.pdf

Simple Soil Mixture Reverses Toxic Stormwater Effects

Study's implications point to benefits of utilizing green stormwater infrastructure to mitigate water pollution in urban and outlying areas.

Runoff at stormwater drain. Wikipedia

PUYALLUP, Wash.—A simple column of common soil can reverse the toxic effects of urban runoff that otherwise quickly kills young coho salmon and their insect prey, according to new research by Washington State University, NOAA Fisheries and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The affordable and remarkably effective treatment offers new promise for controlling toxic pollutants that collect on paved surfaces and wash off as stormwater into rivers, streams and the ocean. Polluted stormwater has been identified as a risk factor for many threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead and has caused die-offs of coho salmon in the Pacific Northwest.

The research builds on increasingly common building practices that promote natural infiltration of stormwater into the ground. It indicates that a “bioretention” system that first filters runoff through a basic soil mixture removes toxics lethal to aquatic life. Such systems are increasingly found in Washington State’s Puget Sound area as people build “rain gardens” that trap runoff before it gets to a creek or stream.

The research published in the journal Chemosphere examined the toxic effects of runoff collected from a major Seattle highway during storms. The untreated runoff killed all juvenile salmon exposed to it within 12 hours. But all fish survived in runoff filtered through the soil column of sand, compost and bark. The soil filtration also prevented reproductive damage to tiny insects salmon eat.

“This is a simple approach that can make a big difference in the quality of water flowing into our rivers and streams,” said Jenifer McIntyre, postdoctoral researcher at Washington State University and lead author of the new research. “In this case, the salmon and their prey are telling us how clean is clean enough.”

Researchers collected runoff from a four-lane Seattle overpass during six storms and transported it to Washington State University’s Research and Extension Center in Puyallup, south of Seattle, where the experimental soil treatment columns were set up. The 12 bioretention columns were 42 inches high and contained 60 percent sand, 15 percent compost, 15 percent shredded bark and 10 percent water treatment residuals, with half also planted with a common sedge.

Impervious surfaces and surface runoff (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Untreated runoff regularly killed aquatic insects such as mayflies but filtering the runoff through soil columns, with or without plants, “conferred complete protection against the lethal toxicity of stormwater runoff,” the scientists wrote. The polluted stormwater also quickly killed coho salmon, but all fish survived exposure to the same runoff after treatment.

“The positive effects on survival are really striking,” said Nat Scholz, manager of the Ecotoxicology Program at NOAA Fisheries’ Northwest Fisheries Science Center and a coauthor of the research. “This is an encouraging lesson for people working to reduce stormwater impacts to salmon habitats.”

Chemical analyses showed the bioretention treatment reduced toxic metals by 30 to 99 percent, reduced polyaromatic hydrocarbons that are byproducts of fossil fuels to levels at or below detection and reduced organic matter by more than 40 percent.

The scientists suggested that further research examine different soil mixes and the reliability of bioretention treatment over time. Additional studies could also examine whether soil filtration protects salmon from more subtle forms of toxicity, including effects on early development, the endocrine system and susceptibility to disease.

The new study is part of a longer-term research effort to develop inexpensive and effective clean water technologies. The work was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Region 10), NOAA’s Coastal Storms Program and the Russell Family Foundation.


Source: WSU News Washington State University.

Related articles

 

• Montana city gets OK to drink water after oil spill in river
• Students make stormwater presentation at Kingston meeting
• Highly toxic residue from winter road salt is killing aquatic life